ADVOCATE MIRIAM FOZIA RAHMAN AND 76 OTHER WOMAN LAWYERS FROM DELHI HIGH COURT WRITES TO THE CHIEF JUSTICE OF INDIA

7 January 2022

To,

The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Natahulapati Venkata Ramana

The Hon’ble Chief Justice of India

Supreme Court of India

Bhagwan Das Road

New Delhi

Subject: Letter Petition, highlighting the failure of the Central and State Governments to secure the Minority Communities in India, their Fundamental Right to life with dignity and safety guaranteed by Article 21 of the Constitution of India.

It is inter-alia prayed that appropriate directions be issued to prevent the dehumanization of minorities by using pejoratives, likening them to animals and germs, spreading fake news by disseminating fearful stereotypes, inciting others to harass or boycott the targeted communities, and giving calls for genocide against minority communities and strictly prohibiting the auctions of human beings like animals. We further pray for issuance of appropriate directions to the Central and State Government to secure and ensure to members of the minority communities, an atmosphere within which they can enjoy their right to life with dignity and security.

Most Respectfully Showeth ; The undersigned Delhi High Court Women Lawyers Forum, is a forum consisting of about 150 women lawyers, for professional engagement of women lawyers, practicing at the Delhi High Court and the Trial Courts. We have been watching with grave concern the growing threats of violence and humiliation targeted towards the minority community, especially because there appears to be a deafening silence from the Central and State Governments to unambiguously deprecate the same and / or tardy to little too late action by the law enforcement machinery.

As the new year 2022 chimed in with promises of betterment in our personal lives as well as the society, a certain app launched on the first day of the year seemed to be almost an ominous prelude to an impending nightmare to Muslim women in India and all that the word ‘Indian’stands for. Like the previously illegal and derogatory app “Sulli Deals” which surfaced in July 2021, (as reported on 12.07.2021 by Times of India), yet another app of the same kind namely ‘Bulli Bai’ has surfaced on the web (as reported on 03.01.2022 by NDTV). Both equally shameful and derogatory towards their target – Muslim women in India.

By way of both these Apps, the culprits have trolled and surveilled Muslim Women and illegally used their photographs to put them up for auction as maids. We believe that the “Bulli Deals” App happened because no one was punished for Sulli Deals. Although FIRs had been previously registered in the matter of Sulli Deals, no one was arrested and the investigation has been a non-starter, in the same.

The lack of action on the Sulli Deals case emboldened the culprits to use pictures of free thinking women who are considered independent with dissenting voices. with impunity . Included in the list is the spouse of a sitting Judge of a High Court ( exemplifying the sense of impunity that the culprits have that they are above the law ) .This amounts to a grave attack on the independence of the judiciary and may have a chilling effect on the ability of other Muslims to take up the position of being judges of the High Court and other courts.

Already Muslims are disproportionately represented in the judiciary and this may make matters worse. Annexed herewith are articles, published in New York Times, Aljazeera andQuint, that aptly exposes the humiliation that the minorities in India are being subjected to with blatant impunity of law and social sanction (Annexed New York Times, BBC, Aljazeera & Quint Article) . These apps not only auction prominent Muslim women on a public platform, but are also attempts to sexualize and dehumanize the larger community.

More humiliating than the existence of the apps themselves, is the sheer audacity of some cowardly minds to attempt something like this, twice, publicly, encouraged by bigotry openly being expressed among the common public and lack of action by the police and the judiciary. These incidents are not only symbols of misogyny and communal enmity, but also show lack of respect and no sense of fear of the law among developers and users of such apps. Clearly it is felt by the perpetrators that there need be no shame, guilt or fear for their actions.

The perverse, sexually coloured comments along with photos of the selected Muslim women is undoubtedly a sexual harassment as well aimed to demean and humiliate women and to make them feel insecure. It is also reflective of the mental and emotional ill health of at least a section of the society, who obviously feel extreme insecurity, a crisis of masculinity. It also treats Muslim women as inanimate objects which can be bought and sold. From the media it has been learnt that FIR u/s 153A, 153 (B), 295 A, 354 D, 509, 500 as well as Section 67 of the IT Act has been registered by the Mumbai Police. We welcome this and would like to see this being taken to its logical end and not to end up as mere tokenism.

Considering the current environment in the country with increasing incidents of violence against individuals and institutions of minority communities perpetrated by anti-social and communal elements, it is obvious that the women named in the app could well be in grave personal danger. Apps like Sulli Deals have created a sense of extreme insecurity among Muslim women in India, especially in the back drop of public calls of genocide of the Muslim community and have raised serious questions on the failure of the Indian law enforcement agencies, to ensure that the Fundamental Right to Life with Dignity as guaranteed by Article 21 of the Constitution of India is secured to all persons irrespective of their religion.

As lawyers, we are not only officers of the Court, but also guardians of the Constitutional Rights of people. Even though the app has been taken down, it was a serious violation of the right to life and liberty of the women portrayed. Even more importantly, it continues to pose a grave danger to the personal safety of the women, as it has already been seen by an unknown number of people. This is not just sexual harassment but a form of sexual violence, and offence under section 153B and stalking as well. Auctioning women online, from a particular community, not once but twice, is not only a criminal offence, but it also deprives people of their right to life with dignity. People are losing faith in the independence of investigative agencies and the lack of deprecation by the Government is worrisome.

With the jurisprudence laid down by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in numerous judgments including Vincent Panikurlangara v. Union of India AIR 1987 (2) SCC 165 and others, there is now a positive obligation upon the State to take steps for ensuring the individual a better enjoyment of her life with dignity. The events of the past few years have indicated that the State has failed in its obligation to secure the Fundamental Right to life with dignity towards the Minority Communities in India. Hence, we appeal to the Hon’ble CJI and his companion Hon’ble Judges to treat our letter and the articles attached herein, as a letter petition, highlighting the failure of the law enforcement agencies Central and State Governments to secure to the Minority Communities in India, their Fundamental Right to life with Dignity and Safety guaranteed by Article 21 of the Constitution of India and to put in place preventive guidelines to ensure accountability of law enforcement agencies and for PREVENTIVE actions so that these incidents never occur again.

It is inter – alia prayed that:

1. Appropriate directions be issued to DM/ SP of every district for preventing the vilification of minorities, spread of fake news about them and calls for genocide against Minority Communities;

2. We further pray for issuance of appropriate directions to the Central and State Government to secure and ensure to members of the Minority Community, an atmosphere within which they can enjoy their right to life with dignity and security.

3. Strictly prohibiting the auctions of human beings like inanimate objects.

4. Monitor the criminal investigation being conducted by Mumbai Police and ensure that the investigation is carried out into the Sulli Deals and Bulli Bai App incidences including investigation into the sources of funding and / or handlers of the persons who set up Sulli Bai & Bulli Bai App, money trail that financed the said App identifying the master minds behind the surveillance of Muslim women illegally auctioned vide the App

5. Draw up the chargesheet with all relevant sections including, if needed Section 120 IPC; 6. Hon’ble Supreme Court may direct a time bound investigation.

 

ANNEXURES

A1: Al Jazeera English: Bulli Bai: India’s Muslim women again listed on app for ‘auction’https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2022/1/2/bulli-bai-muslim-women-auction-online -india

A2: https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-india-59856619.amp

A3: https://www.nytimes.com/2022/01/03/world/asia/india-auction-muslim-women.htm

A4:https://www.thequint.com/voices/opinion/sulli-deals-bulli-bai-daughter-writes-about-m other-auctioned#read-more

Sincerely,

Delhi High Court Women Lawyers Forum (DHCWLF)

1. Miriam Fozia Rahman 2. Zeba Khair 3. Harshita Singhal 4. Jhum Jhum Sarkar 5. Malavika Rajkotia 6. Swaty S. Malik 7. Ritu Bhalla 8. Sumita Kapil 9. Anjali Sharma 10. Sunita Dutt 11. Naomi Chandra 12. Deeksha Dwivedi 13. Manali Singhal 14. Shweta Kapoor 15. Prabhsahay Kaur 16. Iram Majid 17. Radhika Roy 18. Anu Narula 19. Kajal Chandra 20. Nandita Rao 21.Padmapriya 22.Rohini Vijh 23. Amrita Sharma 24. Anusuya Sadhu Sinha 25. Haripriya Padmanabhan 26. Gayatri Virmani 27. Ruchi Singh 28. Renu Gupta 29. Mallika Agarwal 30. Nikita Agarwal 31. Sangeeta Bharti 32. Kirti Singh 33. Anubha Rastogi 34. Suruchi Suri 35. Pooja Saigal 36. Arundhati Katju 37. Sonam Mathur 38. Swathi Sukumar 39. Bani Dikshit 40. Geeta Luthra 41. Ragini Vinaik 42. Saumya Tandon 43. Radhika Kolluru 44. Medha Srivastava 45. Konica Gupta 46. Pooja Dodd 47. Mani Gupta 48. Warisha Farasat 49. Aishwarya Nabh 50. Meghna Sankhla 51. Kiran kalra 52. Anita Abraham 53.Beena Panday 54. Suruchi Jaiswal 55. Shahrukh Alam 56. Srilina Roy 57. Priya Kumar 58. Aakanksha Nehra 59. Neha 60. Smriti Sinha 61. Tarannum Cheema 62. Sanjoli Mehrotra 63. Shreya Singhal 64. Sonia Madan 65. Vrinda Bhandari 66. Sonal Sarda 67. Shivani Luthra Lohiya 68. Abha Thapalyal Gandhi 69. Mahjabeen Shamim 70. Shaheen Parvin 71. Mrinalini Sen Gupta 72. Sadaf Rehman 73. Mona Tomar 74. Hina Tanvir 75 Maimoona Fatima 76. Zobia Rehman Khan 77. Aafreen

Editor's Picks

JAANEMAN| MALAYALAM MOVIE |REVIEW|

SUBTLE HEART RENDERING COMEDY, SUFFICIENTLY DRAMATIC, GRIPPING CHAOS AND BITTERSWEET HUMOUR; A HIGH END COCKTAIL OF SCINTILLATING ENSEMBLE CAST AND CHARACTERS, WRITER- DIRECTOR CHIDAMBARAM ENDURES ALL STORMS TO DELIVER A WINNER

Ensemble casts have a unique place in Malayalam cinema.  For decades, a good family drama in Malayalam has always been a good mix of pain, humour, characters, gripping plots and happy endings.  Writer- Director Chidambaram delivers this fine balance in his debut film Jaaneman and creates a new age ensemble cinema for the routine film goer.

Read More

 THINKALAZHCHA NISHCHAYAM | MALAYALAM CINEMA REVIEW |

SATIRE DRIVEN, NON-MELODRAMATIC, FOCUSED, AND METICULOUSLY SCRIPTED; THIS MOVIE IS A WINNER THROUGH AND THROUGH!

How can one dislike a film that entertains throughout? In english, this movie title means ‘The engagement is on monday’.  There is no surprise in the plot line; all of it is revealed in the title.  The story is about the making of an engagement and the joys and troubles involved.  Senna Hegde pulls off a regular story with exceptional craft. The highlight of the film is its climax.  The climax offers no pomp and show, no tearful departures, no melodramatic breakdowns, no revolutions, no rebellions, no glamour, not even the promised engagement.This film is a must watch not because it is extraordinary, but because it is very ordinary, and the brilliance is entirely in the balance the filmmaker maintained throughout.

 

Read More

KURUP|MALAYALAM MOVIE| REVIEW|
KURUP, THE MOVIE; DULQUER’S ATTEMPT TO CONQUER CINEMASCOPE FILMMAKING LEAVES AUDIENCES EMOTIONLESS

THIS PERIOD MOVIE COMES WITH COMPLETE GRANDEUR; GRAND SETS, STYLE, A GOOD CAST, LEAVES NO STONE UNTURNED IN PRODUCTION, BUT FAILS IN ITS EDITING AND COMPOSITION. DQ DOES NOT BECOME KURUP, KURUP BECOMES DQ. 

Dulquer remains Dulquer, we recognize him and his methods in all his movies and he repeats himself once again.  The actor lacks gravitas in his dialogue delivery and intonation.  Can style and glamour make up for lack of method acting in a role like this?  Did we expect more?

Read More