COP26 CONCLUDES WITH COMMITMENTS TO STRENGTHENING EMISSION REDUCTION GOALS
15 November 2021
Nearly 200 countries reached a climate agreement as the United Nations CLimate Conference COP26 came to an end in Glasgow this year. The agreement contained an unprecedented reference to the role of fossil fuels in the climate catastrophe. India and China have been called out for betraying climate vulnerable poor countries for last minute changes for coal to be ‘phased down’ rather than ‘phased out’. President Alok Sharma said phasing out coal is a key process of the COP26, and that India and China should ‘explain themselves’ for changing at the last minute, he told the BBC.
Despite the alarming urgency that was put forth by climate scientists in the conference along with climate vulnerable countries, the agreement did not reflect the former, but urged more action to reduce emissions next year. The protesters around the world have called the COP26 a ‘failure’ as it did not address the urgency that was around rising temperatures. At the crux of the agreement is a request for countries for the COP27 to update their plans for slashing greenhouse gas emissions by 2030. COP27 will be conducted in Egypt at the end of next year. Even though hopes were high, climate protesters have said the agreement is ‘disappointing’.
“Fossil fuels and their use have enabled parts of the world to attain high levels of growth. Even now, developed countries have not completely phased out coal. The United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) refers to mitigation of GHG emissions from all sources. UNFCCC is not directed at any particular source,” wrote India’s Environment minister Chupendra Yadav in a personal blog on India’s last minute intervention. “Developing countries have a right to their fair share of the global carbon budget and are entitled to the responsible use of fossil fuels”, he added
Tony News Desk
TOP | TRENDING
FACEBOOK’S TOTAL USER BASE DECLINES FOR THE FIRST TIME IN 17 YEARS: REPORT
Facebook has seen a number of controversies in recent years. But now, the company which was recently brought under new parent Meta, is witnessing a decline in its user base. This has happened for the first time in Facebook’s 17 years of existence that its user base has actually gone down.
SUBTLE HEART RENDERING COMEDY, SUFFICIENTLY DRAMATIC, GRIPPING CHAOS AND BITTERSWEET HUMOUR; A HIGH END COCKTAIL OF SCINTILLATING ENSEMBLE CAST AND CHARACTERS, WRITER- DIRECTOR CHIDAMBARAM ENDURES ALL STORMS TO DELIVER A WINNER
Ensemble casts have a unique place in Malayalam cinema. For decades, a good family drama in Malayalam has always been a good mix of pain, humour, characters, gripping plots and happy endings. Writer- Director Chidambaram delivers this fine balance in his debut film Jaaneman and creates a new age ensemble cinema for the routine film goer.
SATIRE DRIVEN, NON-MELODRAMATIC, FOCUSED, AND METICULOUSLY SCRIPTED; THIS MOVIE IS A WINNER THROUGH AND THROUGH!
How can one dislike a film that entertains throughout? In english, this movie title means ‘The engagement is on monday’. There is no surprise in the plot line; all of it is revealed in the title. The story is about the making of an engagement and the joys and troubles involved. Senna Hegde pulls off a regular story with exceptional craft. The highlight of the film is its climax. The climax offers no pomp and show, no tearful departures, no melodramatic breakdowns, no revolutions, no rebellions, no glamour, not even the promised engagement.This film is a must watch not because it is extraordinary, but because it is very ordinary, and the brilliance is entirely in the balance the filmmaker maintained throughout.
KURUP, THE MOVIE; DULQUER’S ATTEMPT TO CONQUER CINEMASCOPE FILMMAKING LEAVES AUDIENCES EMOTIONLESS
THIS PERIOD MOVIE COMES WITH COMPLETE GRANDEUR; GRAND SETS, STYLE, A GOOD CAST, LEAVES NO STONE UNTURNED IN PRODUCTION, BUT FAILS IN ITS EDITING AND COMPOSITION. DQ DOES NOT BECOME KURUP, KURUP BECOMES DQ.
Dulquer remains Dulquer, we recognize him and his methods in all his movies and he repeats himself once again. The actor lacks gravitas in his dialogue delivery and intonation. Can style and glamour make up for lack of method acting in a role like this? Did we expect more?