READING DOWN OF RESTITUTION OF CONJUGAL RIGHTS ESSENTIAL FOR A SAFER INDIA
29 August 2021
(image source – Feminism in India)
As we are in the 21st century, it is high time to rethink and restructure the divorce laws in the country. The Restitution of Conjugal Rights, a legal provision within the Hindu Marriage Act (1955)/Special Marriage Act (1954), is observed and critiqued by feminists and social justice critics as an aberration to women’s rights in the country. This provision limits the right of the withdrawing spouse, and requires them to cohabit with their partner.
In a country bound by systemic oppression of women through patriarchy and caste, it is mostly the women who have to bear the burden of further sharing a space with their emotional/physically abusive male spouses. Essentially a colonial law that was, interestingly, gone away with by the British government in 1970, has still made repercussions to upholding the autonomy of women in the subcontinent. In 2019, the Sections 9 and 22 that were included in the provision was challenged by a petition that cited it violates Article 14, 15 of the Constitution, along with right to privacy. It needs to observed that this section fundamentally violates the bodily agency of the woman as it enforces a conjugal exchange with the partner that they are wishing to separate from.
In 1983, the High Court of Andhra Pradesh had stated that right to privacy is not simply lost due to a marital association of the individual, however, this was later overruled by other High Courts and eventually the Supreme court by reinstating the validity of RCR. The only explication put forth by defenders of RCR is that most women in the country do not belong to a social-economic/political system that gives them a space to withdraw and continue independently. But this critique needs to redefined by not compromising the spatial aspects of a women and separating it from their socio-economic position in their communities.
When a divorce is filed by a woman in the country, or anywhere in the world, it is of utmost assurance that it mostly has something to do with the patriarchal characteristics of the institution of marriage, and the RCR surely restricts the freedom of bodily agency, privacy, dignity and mobility of a woman.
Akmal Ahmed is a final year Masters student in Sociology at the University of
Hyderabad. He is interested in politics, human rights and education.
TOP | TRENDING
FACEBOOK’S TOTAL USER BASE DECLINES FOR THE FIRST TIME IN 17 YEARS: REPORT
Facebook has seen a number of controversies in recent years. But now, the company which was recently brought under new parent Meta, is witnessing a decline in its user base. This has happened for the first time in Facebook’s 17 years of existence that its user base has actually gone down.
SUBTLE HEART RENDERING COMEDY, SUFFICIENTLY DRAMATIC, GRIPPING CHAOS AND BITTERSWEET HUMOUR; A HIGH END COCKTAIL OF SCINTILLATING ENSEMBLE CAST AND CHARACTERS, WRITER- DIRECTOR CHIDAMBARAM ENDURES ALL STORMS TO DELIVER A WINNER
Ensemble casts have a unique place in Malayalam cinema. For decades, a good family drama in Malayalam has always been a good mix of pain, humour, characters, gripping plots and happy endings. Writer- Director Chidambaram delivers this fine balance in his debut film Jaaneman and creates a new age ensemble cinema for the routine film goer.
SATIRE DRIVEN, NON-MELODRAMATIC, FOCUSED, AND METICULOUSLY SCRIPTED; THIS MOVIE IS A WINNER THROUGH AND THROUGH!
How can one dislike a film that entertains throughout? In english, this movie title means ‘The engagement is on monday’. There is no surprise in the plot line; all of it is revealed in the title. The story is about the making of an engagement and the joys and troubles involved. Senna Hegde pulls off a regular story with exceptional craft. The highlight of the film is its climax. The climax offers no pomp and show, no tearful departures, no melodramatic breakdowns, no revolutions, no rebellions, no glamour, not even the promised engagement.This film is a must watch not because it is extraordinary, but because it is very ordinary, and the brilliance is entirely in the balance the filmmaker maintained throughout.
KURUP, THE MOVIE; DULQUER’S ATTEMPT TO CONQUER CINEMASCOPE FILMMAKING LEAVES AUDIENCES EMOTIONLESS
THIS PERIOD MOVIE COMES WITH COMPLETE GRANDEUR; GRAND SETS, STYLE, A GOOD CAST, LEAVES NO STONE UNTURNED IN PRODUCTION, BUT FAILS IN ITS EDITING AND COMPOSITION. DQ DOES NOT BECOME KURUP, KURUP BECOMES DQ.
Dulquer remains Dulquer, we recognize him and his methods in all his movies and he repeats himself once again. The actor lacks gravitas in his dialogue delivery and intonation. Can style and glamour make up for lack of method acting in a role like this? Did we expect more?