SC EXPRESSES DISSATISFACTION IN LAKHIMPUR INVESTIGATION, SUGGESTS EX-HC JUDGE TO MONITOR PROBE
09 November 2021
The Supreme Court on Monday had a hearing of the Lakhimpur Kheri matter in which it expressed dissatisfaction in the Uttar Pradesh government’s investigation. The court proposed to appoint a retired High Court Judge to monitor the probe till the charge sheet is filed. The court pointed out the ‘mixing up’ of investigation in the cases related to the October 3rd incident which killed 4 farmers in the area. Ten people in the case have been arrested including Minister of State for Home Ajay Mishra’s son Ashish Mishra.
Justice Surya Kant who is part of the three-member bench headed by Chief Justice N V Rama observed, “What it appears to us is that this SIT somehow or the other is unable to maintain investigative distance between the cases”. “We are trying to appoint a retired judge from a different High Court to monitor the investigation on a day-to-day basis…We are not confident…We don’t want judicial commission appointed by your state to continue…”, he added.
The bench suggested this as the statements of witnesses relating to the death of the BJP workers who died in the incident, were overlapping with that of the death of the four farmers. Harish Salve, representing the state, said this was because the statements on the death of the farmers were also being given by the witnesses.
Justice Hima Kohli suggested the names of judges be appointed in the monitoring- Justice Ranjit Singh from Punjab and Haryana High Court and J Rakesh Kumar Jain. Advocate Salve said the government can appoint.
The CJI justified the SC’s suggestion to appoint a High Court judge while having and exchange with Salve on the death of the Journalist, with Salve saying all of them were crushed by the car but there were ‘political overtones’. To which the CJI replied “We don’t want to have any political overtones
Tony News Desk
TOP | TRENDING
FACEBOOK’S TOTAL USER BASE DECLINES FOR THE FIRST TIME IN 17 YEARS: REPORT
Facebook has seen a number of controversies in recent years. But now, the company which was recently brought under new parent Meta, is witnessing a decline in its user base. This has happened for the first time in Facebook’s 17 years of existence that its user base has actually gone down.
SUBTLE HEART RENDERING COMEDY, SUFFICIENTLY DRAMATIC, GRIPPING CHAOS AND BITTERSWEET HUMOUR; A HIGH END COCKTAIL OF SCINTILLATING ENSEMBLE CAST AND CHARACTERS, WRITER- DIRECTOR CHIDAMBARAM ENDURES ALL STORMS TO DELIVER A WINNER
Ensemble casts have a unique place in Malayalam cinema. For decades, a good family drama in Malayalam has always been a good mix of pain, humour, characters, gripping plots and happy endings. Writer- Director Chidambaram delivers this fine balance in his debut film Jaaneman and creates a new age ensemble cinema for the routine film goer.
SATIRE DRIVEN, NON-MELODRAMATIC, FOCUSED, AND METICULOUSLY SCRIPTED; THIS MOVIE IS A WINNER THROUGH AND THROUGH!
How can one dislike a film that entertains throughout? In english, this movie title means ‘The engagement is on monday’. There is no surprise in the plot line; all of it is revealed in the title. The story is about the making of an engagement and the joys and troubles involved. Senna Hegde pulls off a regular story with exceptional craft. The highlight of the film is its climax. The climax offers no pomp and show, no tearful departures, no melodramatic breakdowns, no revolutions, no rebellions, no glamour, not even the promised engagement.This film is a must watch not because it is extraordinary, but because it is very ordinary, and the brilliance is entirely in the balance the filmmaker maintained throughout.
KURUP, THE MOVIE; DULQUER’S ATTEMPT TO CONQUER CINEMASCOPE FILMMAKING LEAVES AUDIENCES EMOTIONLESS
THIS PERIOD MOVIE COMES WITH COMPLETE GRANDEUR; GRAND SETS, STYLE, A GOOD CAST, LEAVES NO STONE UNTURNED IN PRODUCTION, BUT FAILS IN ITS EDITING AND COMPOSITION. DQ DOES NOT BECOME KURUP, KURUP BECOMES DQ.
Dulquer remains Dulquer, we recognize him and his methods in all his movies and he repeats himself once again. The actor lacks gravitas in his dialogue delivery and intonation. Can style and glamour make up for lack of method acting in a role like this? Did we expect more?